The legal path between employee arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and representative claims under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) has been anything but smooth. A new (albeit unpublished and uncitable) case, Piran v. Yamaha Motor Corp., et al., No. G062198, 2024 WL 484845 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2024)(unpub.) (“Yamaha”), helps to illustrate the challenges and unanswered questions lingering in the wake of this rapidly-developing area of law.
Latest Post
More Posts
Employees’ Rights to Workplace Violence TRO’s Expanded in California
California Senate Bill 533 Mandates That Employers Create Workplace Violence Prevention Programs
Ninth Circuit Confirms FMCSA Preemption of California’s Meal and Rest Break Laws Applies Retroactively
California Expected to Adopt New Pay Disclosure Requirements for Employers
Keep On Truckin’: California’s Meal And Rest Break Rules Preempted By FMCSA
California Supreme Court Clarifies Burden of Proof in Whistleblower Retaliation Claims
Cal/OSHA Enters the New Year With Expanded Enforcement Authority
California Proposed Legislation – “Silenced No More Act” (SB-331)
Mid-Year California Case Law Update
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org