INTRODUCTION:
Recently, in NTPC v. M/s Deconar Services Pvt. Ltd.[1], a three judge bench of the Supreme Court has, in line with the settled principle of minimum interference in arbitral awards, inter alia reiterated that in order to succeed in a challenge against an arbitral award, the party challenging the award must show that the arbitrator’s award suffered from perversity; or an error of law; or that the arbitrator had otherwise misconducted himself. The Court highlighted that merely showing that there is another reasonable interpretation or possible view on the basis of the material on record is insufficient to allow interference by the Court.
Latest Post
More Posts
Supreme Court Clarifies Law on Limitation Period for Filing an Appeal under Section 37 of The Arbitration Act
This Is the End: What Now? The Aftermath of an Award being Set Aside
The 1986 Act or The 2019 Act? The Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability
Limitation period for filing a Section 34 Petition begins from the Date of Receipt of the Signed Copy of the Arbitral Award
Supreme Court Clarifies that Acceptance of a Conditional Offer with a Further Condition does not Result in a Concluded Contract
Writs Against Orders Passed by Arbitral Tribunals – The Supreme Court Reiterates the Law
Decoding the Law on Anticipatory Bail
The Supreme Court Revisits the Consequences of Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on the Arbitration Agreement – Part II
The Supreme Court Revisits the Consequences of Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on the Arbitration Agreement – Part I
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org