Many companies unwittingly expose themselves to defamation suits by reporting a former employee as “guilty” of sexual harassment in a Background Verification (BGV) check when the inquiry is either pending, inconclusive, or the person was merely an “accused” (Respondent) without a final verdict. Confidentiality is a critical aspect for an effective inquiry and redressal mechanism
More Posts
Can the POSH Nodal Officer Be an Internal Committee (IC) Member?
The "Compliance Collision": When POSH Meets the New Labour Codes
January 31st or February 28th? Decoding State-Specific POSH Annual Report Deadlines (CY 2025)
The POSH Quagmire: How IC Procedural Lapses Void Entire Disciplinary Actions and Cost Employers Lakhs
PoSH Compliance 2025-2026: Why Your Annual Report to the District Officer is Still Mandatory (SHe-Box is NOT a Replacement)
One Company, Multiple ICs? Decoding the POSH Act's 'Every Location' Rule
Can Non-Registration on SHe-Box Be Treated as Non-Compliance of the POSH Act – and Trigger Section 134(8) Penalties?
From 'Not Established' to Trial: 7 Key Lessons for ICs from the Delhi High Court's Asif Hamid Khan Ruling
Can Witnesses Refuse Internal Complaints Committee Summons in Sexual Harassment Cases? A Legal Analysis
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org