Earlier this month the Supreme Court of Ohio resolved a split of authority between the Fifth District and Seventh District regarding whether a foreclosure decree is a final appealable order when it includes unspecified amounts advanced by the mortgagee for inspections, appraisals, property protection and the like. Prior to the May 15 decision in CitiMortgage
More Posts
FBI increases criminal fraud investigations by 65%, director reports
U.S. Supreme Court Says Restitution Depends on Property a Lender Loses, not Collateral the Lender Receives
Law v. Siegel, __ U.S. ___, 134 S.CT. 1188 (2014): The Supreme Court Addresses the Scope of the “All Writs” Provision in the Bankruptcy Code
In re McKenzie, 737 f.3d 1034 (6th cir. 2013) Extending the Deadline for Trustees to Attack Preferences: The Sixth Circuit’s Life Jacket for Tardy Trustees
Planning For Leasehold Financing
What Happens When You Lose: The Downside of Binding Arbitration
Be Conscientious About Standard of Care and Ethics Because, as with all Nightmares, This Could Happen to You
The Sixth Circuit Holds that Bankruptcy Courts Lack the Inherent Power to Award “Serious Non-Compensatory Punitive Damages”
Amendment to Agricultural Lien Law Reinforces Decision in Ohio Dept. of Agriculture v. Central Erie Supply & Elevator Association
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org