A California federal court has denied cross-motions for summary judgment and held that issues of material fact remained as to whether an insurer should have settled a case for less than its policy limit and as to whether it filed an interpleader action in bad faith. Doublevision Entm’t, LLC v. Navigators Spec. Ins. Co., 2015 WL 3919587 (N.D. Cal. June 25, 2015).
More Posts
No Coverage Under Claims-Made-And-Reported Policy Where Claim Not Made or Reported During the Policy Period
Crime Bond Affords No Coverage Where Insured Bank Fails to Submit Complete Proof of Loss Prior to FDIC’s Appointment as Receiver
Regulatory Exclusion Bars Coverage for False Claims Act Action Pursued By Qui Tam Relator
Insurer Entitled To Recoup Settlement Payment Made in Underlying Action
No Coverage for Prosecuting an Affirmative Counterclaim
No Coverage Where Underlying Complaint Did Not Allege Conduct After Retroactive Date; Suits Involving Nearly Identical Course of Conduct Are Related
Coverage Determined By Date Notice Is Received By Insurer, Not By Date It Is Sent
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org