Last month, I had the incredible honor of being elected to the Michigan Court of Appeals. While I am thrilled to begin this new chapter as a judge, leaving my dream job at Ackerman & Ackerman—and the chance to work alongside my dad every day—is bittersweet. As I prepare to move on, I want to
Latest Post
More Posts
The Pitfalls of Objectively Measured Just Compensation: When Market Value Isn’t Enough
Valuation of Partial Takings
How to Make “Just Compensation” More “Just” for Displaced Homeowners
The Fundamentals of Easement Valuation
Transmission Lines and Eminent Domain: What Property Owners Need to Know
The Eminent Domain Podcast’s Episode 123: Matthew Ackerman on Subjective Losses in Takings
Why condemnors should pay property owners’ attorney fees in eminent domain cases (and a 50-state survey on the issue)
When Market Value Isn’t Enough: The Pitfalls of Objectively Measured Just Compensation
In cases involving partial takings of easements, just compensation must be based on the condemnor’s maximum possible use of the easement, even if that use is theoretical or unlikely
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org