The Federal Circuit on June 14 affirmed Patent Office decisions in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings canceling patents the University of Minnesota owned, concluding that “state sovereign immunity does not apply to these proceedings.” The court’s conclusion is not limited to instances where, for example, a state university waives its sovereign immunity by asserting a patent in federal court proceedings. One broad import of the court’s holding therefore is that all state university patents are vulnerable to attack in PTO proceedings. Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. LSI Corp., Appeal 2018-1559 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2019); Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. Ericsson Inc., Appeals 2018-1560 et seq. (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2019).
Latest Post
More Posts
Federal Circuit Puts Nail in Coffin For Petitioner’s Case Challenging Casket Patent
PTAB Was Wrong to Ignore an Applicant’s Prosecution Disclaimer Because of Examiner’s Reasons for Allowance
Federal Circuit Upholds Board’s Use of Control Standard of Privity to Assess Time Bar
Federal Circuit Splits Hairs in Hair Removal Product Interference Proceeding
Mixed Result Upheld in Personal Audio IPRs
PTAB May Cite New References Not Cited in the IPR Petition
When is There Standing to Appeal a PGR Final Written Decision?
A Split Federal Circuit Panel “at Once Envisaged” Different Conclusions of Anticipation
Cases to Watch
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org