The contours of plaintiff pleading requirements for ERISA fiduciary breach claims sketched by the Supreme Court in Hughes v. Northwestern University continue to evolve. Recent cases suggest that plaintiffs may find ERISA class action lawsuits increasingly vulnerable to motions to dismiss unless they allege context specific defects in the processes followed by defined contribution plan fiduciaries in
Latest Post
More Posts
Charting a ‘Northwestern’ Passage: ERISA’s Duty of Prudence and Requirements for Pleading a Breach After ‘Hughes v. Northwestern University’
Supreme Court Holds ERISA Requires Plaintiffs to Allege Context-Specific Breaches of Fiduciary Duty to Monitor
Process Prevails in ERISA Excessive Fee Victories
PEPs and MEPs: Compliance and Fiduciary Considerations Under the SECURE Act
PEPs and MEPs: Compliance and Fiduciary Considerations Under the SECURE Act
ERISA Fiduciary Claims Not Subject to Arbitration
The ‘Gaming’ of Pension Plan Actuarial Assumptions
The ‘Gaming’ of Pension Plan Actuarial Assumptions
Multiemployer Plans Poised For More Assumption Rate Suits
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS