The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Range of Motion Products v. Armaid is another reminder that, if care is not taken, design patent scope can be narrowed significantly in the U.S. through functionality analysis—often at the claim construction stage—and even result in summary judgment of non-infringement.
Latest Post
More Posts
Another Step Forward: Further Updates on In re Maatita and Design Definiteness
Recap of 2024 U.S. Design Patent Drama: Here’s What We Know Now
While There is an Active Utility Application, There is Design Hope
Protecting the Product: Furniture
R.I.P. Mr. Rosen: Federal Circuit Upends Longstanding Design Patent Obviousness Test
Design Patents are Heating Up at the Federal Circuit, Again
Uncertainty Ahead if Design Patent Obviousness Test is Abrogated by en banc CAFC
Flawless Legs and a Shaved Head? An Ordinary Observer Can Tell the Difference
Protecting the Product™: Typefaces and Fonts
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org