Last year the Texas Supreme Court decided Mitchell v. MAP Resources, holding that a mineral owner whose interest was sold at a tax foreclosure could collaterally attack the judgment and introduce extrinsic evidence that he had not been properly served with notice of the suit and therefore was deprived of due process under the
More Posts
Point Energy Partners Permian v. MRC Permian Company – did a force majeure event save the lease?
Crane County salt water spill from overpressured zone used for water disposal
GDHM Land & Mineral Owner Seminar next April
Contrasting Philosophies of Lease Construction: Boulder County v. Crestone Peak (Colo. 2023)
The New World of “Differentiated/Certified Gas”
Iskandia Energy Operating vs SWEPI LP – The looming problem of contamination by salt water injection wells in the Permian
Devillier v. State of Texas: An Important Case for Texas Landowners
City of Dallas v. Trinity East Energy – Texas Supreme Court Refuses City’s Petition on Appeal of $33 million judgment
World Electricity Sources in 2022
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org