In SEC v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859, 603 U.S. __ (2024), the Supreme Court held that the Seventh Amendment prohibits the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) from seeking civil penalties in certain enforcement actions when the Commission chooses to proceed in-house before its own administrative law judges (ALJs), rather than in federal court. In a 6-3 opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court held that the Seventh Amendment requires, at a minimum, that any fraud action involving civil penalties be tried in front of a jury in federal court. The Court’s decision will have immediate implications for the SEC’s enforcement program and will likely have broader implications for administrative adjudications for a host of federal agencies and federal laws.
Latest Post
More Posts
SBA Issues Interim Guidance After Ultima Decision Finds 8(a) Program Violates Equal Protection
U.S. Department of Education Launches Secret Shoppers Program to Investigate Colleges and Universities
DOJ Announces “Pilot Program Regarding Compensation Incentives and Clawbacks” with Significant Ramifications for Corporations Facing Criminal Investigations
Education Department to Hold Owners, Individuals, Board Members Liable for Higher Education Institutions
Department of Education Guidance Expands Possible Liability for Private Companies That Contract With Higher Education Institutions
New DOJ Guidance on Corporate Criminal Enforcement
Tide Is Turning Against FCA Case Dismissals
Tide Is Turning Against FCA Case Dismissals
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Clarify False Claims Act Falsity Standard
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org