In Huskey v. Colgate-Palmolive Company, No. 4:19-cv-02710-JAR (E.D. Mo.), plaintiffs Drew Huskey and Jamie Richard (Plaintiffs) claimed that Colgate-Palmolive Company (Colgate) falsely advertised that its Speed Stick Stainguard antiperspirant products (Speed Stick) fight yellow stains and white marks on clothing. Plaintiffs claimed that they purchased Speed Stick, but continued to experience marks and stains on
More Posts
Ghirardelli Defeats White Baking Chips False Advertising Claims Premised On Faulty Survey Evidence
What will “Phase II” of COVID-19 Class Actions Look Like?
“Prime Pork” Grading Claims Dismissed by Federal Judge In Florida
Court Rejects As Speculative Putative Class Action Complaint Alleging “V’nilla Almond” Granola Is Not Flavored Exclusively From Vanilla Beans
Third CBD False Advertising Case Halted this Year Pending FDA Review
Another Federal Court Halts False Advertising Case Pending FDA Review of CBD
Another Slack Fill Preemption Win for the Cosmetics Industry in Critcher v. L’Oreal
Cosmetic or Drug? California Federal Court Refuses to Say.
As the Spread of Coronavirus Slows, a Contagion of Class Actions Has Only Begun
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org