On January 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hughes v. Northwestern University that the plaintiff-participants will get another opportunity to assert that the Northwestern retirement plan fiduciaries violated ERISA’s duty of prudence based on the following: the number of investment options included on the plan menu; the decision to contract with multiple recordkeepers who put
Latest Post
More Posts
How Would an ESG-Friendly DOL Final Rule Change the Investment Marketplace for ERISA Plans?
The DOL’s About-face on ESG for ERISA Plan Fiduciary Investment Decision-making
Podcast: Recent ERISA Litigation Trends & Outcomes
Large IRAs and High-Income Retirement Savers Targeted by Amendment to Budget Reconciliation Bill
Podcast: The U.S. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear the Northwestern University Retirement Plan Fee Lawsuit
Ropes & Gray Hosts Webinar on Retirement Plan Litigation for Employers and Plan Sponsors
Podcast: The DOL’s Cybersecurity Guidance for Retirement Plan Sponsors, Service Providers and Participants
Podcast: The DOL’s Cybersecurity Guidance for Retirement Plan Sponsors, Service Providers and Participants
Podcast: The Evolving Regulatory Landscape for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries—Cybersecurity Concerns for Plan Sponsors
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org