In LKQ v. GM, a May 21, 2024 en banc decision on an appeal of an IPR final written decision determining that the challenged claim of GM’s U.S. Design Patent No. D797,625 (directed to the design for a vehicle front fender) was not obvious, the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB’s decision, overruling the Rosen-Durling test for obviousness of design patents and articulating general guidance for a new obviousness test it determined was more consistent with Supreme Court authority, in particular the “flexible standards” applied in Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co., 148 U.S. 674 (1893), Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966), and KSR v. Teleflex, 550 U.S. 398 (2007).
Latest Post
More Posts
PTAB Invalidates GUI, but Leaves Obviousness Test Gooey
No design patents for you!–Extension of Fox Factory Complicates Reliance on Indicia of Non-Obviousness
PTAB Should Have Determined that Gravity Feed Display Design Patent is Obvious
Contour of Soup Can Saves Gravity Feed Display Design Patent
Should I Stay or Should I Go? – Co-Pending IPR and Litigation Can Lead to Discovery Obligations
It All Depends On How You Frame It
House of Cards: Weak Evidentiary Support Dooms IPR of Med Device Patent
PTAB Provides Roadmap for Petitioning for IPR of Design Patents
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org