California’s Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA)[1] allows “aggrieved employees” to sue their employers for Labor Code violations to collect civil penalties “on behalf of himself or herself and other current or former employees.” The issue of how to resolve PAGA claims where the employee and employer are subject to a binding arbitration agreement has been hotly contested over the last several years, as reported many times in this blog [see here, here, and here].
Latest Post
More Posts
California Supreme Court Clarifies PAGA Standing When “Individual PAGA Claims” Have Been Compelled to Arbitration
California Court of Appeal Holds That a PAGA Plaintiff Maintains Standing to Assert Representative Claims Even When Individual Claims Are Compelled to Arbitration
Supreme Court Holds That PAGA Representative Waivers Are Enforceable In Certain Significant Respects
Peace for Piece-Rate Employers in Washington
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects ‘Wholly Groundless’ Exception to Delegation Clauses in Arbitration Agreements
California Supreme Court Issues Narrow Holding In De Minimis Case, Leaving Many Issues Unresolved
Federal Court Strikes Down Department of Labor’s Overtime Rule
Third Circuit Finds No ADA Violation Where Employee Deemed Unfit for Duty
Philadelphia Employers Barred from Asking about Wage History
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS