On May 28, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) announced it had reached a $1.2 billion settlement with Teva Pharmaceuticals,[1] which acquired Cephalon in 2012, over reverse payment for its narcolepsy drug, Provigil. The Cephalon settlement also has non-monetary terms that bar Cephalon from entering agreements that include (i) payments to a generic filer and (ii) an agreement by a generic filer not to develop or market a drug within 30 days of a patent settlement that impedes generic entry.[2] The FTC has lauded the outcome of Cephalon—its first settlement post-Actavis[3]—with FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez hailing it as a “landmark settlement” and “an important step in the FTC’s ongoing effort to protect consumers from anticompetitive pay for delay settlements.”[4]
Latest Post
More Posts
California Supreme Court Delineates a Structured Rule of Reason Analysis for Evaluating Reverse Payment or Pay-for-Delay Settlements
What Does the First-Ever Extradition on an Antitrust Charge Mean for the Auto Parts Investigation?
FTC v. Actavis: What Does It Mean for Reverse-Payment Settlements?
JFTC Releases Survey on Corporate Compliance Efforts and Recommends Best Practices
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS