As cannabis growers and retailers struggle with the complex and onerous regulatory scheme governing California’s emerging legal marijuana marketplace, they may be excused for overlooking the requirements of California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986—more commonly known as Proposition 65. Neither the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA), nor its implementing regulations, reference or suggest that cannabis growers or retailers are subject to Proposition 65. Yet, Proposition 65 plainly applies to cannabis and cannabis products, and ignorance of its requirements can prove costly to fledgling and established cannabis businesses alike.
Latest Post
More Posts
The USDA’s Proposed National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard
Upcoming Webinar: Peeling Back the Label – A Look at Product Labeling Litigation in 2015
California To Loosen Its Restrictions on “Made in USA” Labeling
After Long Battle in Brown v. The American Tobacco Co., Defendant Prevails Where Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Actual Damages
Ninth Circuit Decision Instructs Lower Courts and Businesses on Evidence That Satisfies Class Action Fairness Act’s Amount in Controversy Requirement
Major v. Ocean Spray: Court Denies Certification of Putative Classes That Include Products Not Purchased By Plaintiff in Food Labeling Case
Connect: http://www.seyfarth.com/JayConnolly
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS