In NuStar Energy Services, Inc. v. M/V COSCO AUCKLAND, No. 17-20246 (5th Cir. Jan. 14, 2019), the U.S. Fifth Circuit concluded NuStar, the physical supplier of bunkers/marine fuel to the M/V COSCO AUCKLAND, lacked standing to appeal the district court’s ruling that O.W. Bunker Far East (S) Pte Ltd., the contract supplier of bunkers,
Latest Post
More Posts
Ninth Circuit Limits its KEN LUCKY Decision to its Procedural Peculiarities
More Energy Service Contracts Should Now Qualify as Maritime
Is There a Coming Sea Change in the Analysis of Whether Energy Services Contracts Are Maritime?
Fifth Circuit Affirms Use of Special Jury Interrogatory on Whether an Accident Occurred
Forget the Invites, Use a Contract Instead
Eighteen Percentage Spread between Pre- and Post-Judgment Interest Rates Affirmed
When In Doubt, File the Limitation Complaint (Part III): The Test Is Reasonable Possibility
UPDATE: Punitive Damages for Jones Act Seamen are not “Pining for the Fjords, they’re Dead”!
Enforcing Foreign Judgments in U.S. Admiralty Courts: Second Circuit Prefers Substance Over Form
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org