Summary: The Securities Appellate Tribunal and Supreme Court recently had the occasion to examine what amounts to securities fraud. While in BDMCL, the SAT examined whether the essential ingredients of fraud were satisfied, in Terrascope, the Supreme Court ruled that false promises in fundraising documents amount to fraud and the same cannot be ratified subsequently by shareholders. Together, these rulings highlight the critical role of transparency and accountability in corporate disclosures.
Latest Post
More Posts
Reconciling Conflict in Arbitration Clause and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause
Can housing societies withhold permission to install electric vehicle chargers?
ESMA consults on possible changes to Credit Rating Agencies regulatory framework
ECB consults on the draft guide on financial conglomerate reporting of significant risk concentrations and intragroup transactions
European Parliament publishes report on the proposal for a directive amending Directive 2009/138/EC as regards the proportionality, quality of supervision, reporting, long-term guarantee measures, macro-prudential tools, sustainability risks, group and cross-border supervision
Priority Of Dues Under SARFAESI: Bombay High Court Reiterates
Time spent in contractually mandated pre-arbitral negotiations not excluded – SC in B&T AG v Ministry of Defence
Time spent in contractually mandated pre-arbitral negotiations not excluded – SC in B&T AG v Ministry of Defence
Execution meeting spirit of the text will determine success of Vivad se Vishwas II
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS