The Third Circuit recently heard oral argument on the ongoing question regarding the constitutionality of the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act (FCA). The issue arose in United States ex rel. Penelow v. Janssen Products, LP, No. 25-1818 (3d Cir.) — a non-intervened qui tam that went to trial and ultimately led to
Latest Post
More Posts
No Contract for You: The Administration’s Newest Playbook for Policing Contractor DEI
Federal Grant Recipients and Applicants Face New and Increased Obligations to Disclose Potential Wrongdoing
The Power of the Sentencing Disparity Argument and Using the Judicial Sentencing Information Platform to Make One
DOJ Announces Its FCA Enforcement Priorities for 2024: Cybersecurity, COVID-19, and Healthcare Fraud
The Haunting in the Cornfield: Relators’ Qui Tam Claim Confirmed Dead by the Eighth Circuit
The Zero-Point Offender Adjustment: U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Proposed Amendment Gives Some First-Time Offenders a Break
Philips Agrees to Pay $62M to Settle FCPA Books-and-Records Violations from Efforts to Win Chinese Contracts
The RESTRICT Act: A Potential New Enforcement Tool to Address Economic and National Security Concerns Posed by Foreign Information and Communications Technologies
A Grinchmas for Relators — First Circuit Denies Relators’ Requests for Attorneys’ Fees in Case Involving Issues of First Impression
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org