Law firms that have been targeted by executive actions from the Trump administration are responding in a variety of ways. Some have chosen a confrontational approach, while others are attempting to negotiate and find common ground. With limited time, each firm is weighing the pros and cons of different strategies and evaluating the likely outcomes.
More Posts
Is Perkins Coie’s Executive Order Fight a ‘Unique Branding Opportunity’? [The American Lawyer Quotes Gina Rubel]
Furia Rubel Recognized by National Law Journal Readers for Legal Marketing and PR Services
The One Thing You Should Always Say to a Journalist Near the End of an Interview
Reputational Management: Crafting and issuing effective public statements [Published in Business of Law DIGEST]
Morgan Lewis chair Jami McKeon says AI mastery will differentiate law firms [Philadelphia Business Journal Quotes Gina Rubel]
Reputational Management: When the time comes to break up with Twitter (X), here’s how to do it safely [Published in Business of Law DIGEST]
Social Media Fury Targeting Insurers Should Spark Strategic Changes, Experts Say [Published in P&C Specialist]
Reputation Management: Protecting law firm data and reputation: A guide to cybercrime mitigation, Part III [Published in Business of Law DIGEST]
Navigating the New Reality: A Strategic Guide for Law Firm Leaders to Handle Political and Social Issues
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org