A Minnesota federal court, applying Minnesota law, has held that no coverage exists under a general liability policy for claims involving a defective adhesive product because the claims were first made before the policy incepted. Ritrama, Inc. v. HDI-Gerling America Insurance Co., 2014 WL 4829088 (D. Minn. Sept. 29, 2014). In so holding, the court concluded that communications sent to the insured stating that the insured may be liable for damages constituted a “claim.”
More Posts
D&O Insurers Liable for $30 Million Judgment Arising from Dissolution of Hospital Affiliation
Fee Dispute Exclusion in Bank E&O Policy Not Triggered by Allegations Concerning Overdraft Charges
New York High Court Holds that Timely Notice to Broker Does Not Satisfy Required Notice to Insurer
“No Direct Action” Rule Bars Claimant’s Declaratory Judgment Claim Against Insurer
Fourth Circuit Holds That Nonprofit Management Liability Policy Does Not Afford Coverage for Reimbursement of Stolen Social Security Benefits
Court Holds That Policy’s Misrepresentation Clause Set Higher Standard for Rescission
Criminal Indictment Constitutes Related Claim to Letter from State Attorney General
Two Lawsuits Involve “Interrelated Wrongful Acts” Where They Allege a Common, Continuing Scheme by the Insured
No “Collusion” Requirement for I-v-I Exclusion
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org