On January 8, 2019, Judge Grasz, writing for an Eighth Circuit panel, reiterated the need for district courts to determine Article III standing before approving class settlements. The appeal stemmed from a putative class action wherein U.S. District Court Judge Nanette Laughrey decided to enforce the parties’ tentative settlement agreement without first deciding the standing
More Posts
Article III Standing to Remain a Rigorous Federal Court Impediment for Plaintiffs who Allege Damages Limited to Technical Statutory Violations
The Ninth Circuit Demands Simplicity: Background Check Disclosure Forms That Contain State-Law Notices or Improper Grammar Violate the FCRA
Illinois Supreme Court Opens Floodgates For Damages In Class Actions Alleging Violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”)
Seyfarth Legal Forum: 2018 Highlights And A Look Ahead to 2019
BIPA: Exemptions May Be On The Horizon For The Decade-Old Statute
CFPB Commotion Continues: Leandra English Resigns from CFPB Deputy Director Post
An SDNY Dilemma: CFPB Held Unconstitutional Over Director Removal Provision
Supreme Court Rules that Class Actions Do Not Toll the Limitations Period for Successive Class Actions
D.C. Circuit Questions English’s Standing to Challenge CFPB Control
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS