The legal path between employee arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and representative claims under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) has been anything but smooth. A new (albeit unpublished and uncitable) case, Piran v. Yamaha Motor Corp., et al., No. G062198, 2024 WL 484845 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2024)(unpub.) (“Yamaha”), helps to illustrate the challenges and unanswered questions lingering in the wake of this rapidly-developing area of law.
Latest Post
More Posts
COVID Vaccine Class Action Reminds Employers to Individually Consider Accommodations
New York May Become Hostile Territory in Shifting Non-Compete Landscape
Swales Has Minimal Impact in Maximus’s Bid to Pause Collective Action Pending Appeal
Massachusetts High Court Decides Intrastate Delivery Drivers Unable to Ditch Their Arbitration Agreements
Assessing Wage and Hour Insurance Coverage Following Proposed FLSA Amendments
Proposed “Wage Theft” Amendment Could Dramatically Alter FLSA Rights & Remedies
Massachusetts Employers Cautioned Regarding Performance Review Rebuttals
Proposed Federal Legislation Quietly Threatens Viability of Class and Collective Action Waivers Through New House Spending Bill
Amidst Uncertainty Surrounding the Scope of BIPA Liability, Hyatt Settles Employee Biometric Data Class Claims for $1.5 Million
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org