On August 1, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling in Turrieta v. Lyft, Inc., to address whether a party can intervene in another party’s ongoing Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action that asserts overlapping claims. In an opinion authored by Justice Martin J. Jenkins, the court held that granting such authority to a party would be “inconsistent” with the intent of PAGA.
Latest Post
More Posts
Ninth Circuit Confirms De Minimis Doctrine Applies to Overtime Claims and Reverses District Court Judgment on Boot Up and Shut Down Pay
California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22
Deadline for California Employer’s Pay Reports Fast Approaches
The California Supreme Court Clarifies Compensable Time
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org