The Tax Court’s recent decision in Walquist v. Commissioner, 152 T.C. No. 3, further clarified the application of the supervisor approval requirement under section 6751(b)(1), which has been a key issue since Chai v. Commissioner, 851 F.3d 190 (2d Cir. 2017). In Walquist, the Tax Court held that accuracy-related penalties determined by an IRS computer
Latest Post
More Posts
Tax Court Holds that Supervisor Approval Requirement Does Not Apply to Penalties Determined by Computer Program
New York Department of Taxation and Finance Issues Notice Regarding Sales Tax Registration Requirement for Businesses with No Physical Presence in New York
New York Department of Taxation and Finance Issues Notice Regarding Sales Tax Registration Requirement for Businesses with No Physical Presence in New York
Pennsylvania Issues Guidance in Response to Supreme Court Decision in Wayfair
Pennsylvania Issues Guidance in Response to Supreme Court Decision in Wayfair
Like-kind Exchanges Limited to Real Property
Like-kind Exchanges Limited to Real Property
New Jersey Offers Tax Amnesty Program
New Jersey Offers Tax Amnesty Program
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org