On January 24, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hughes v. Northwestern University that the plaintiff-participants will get another opportunity to assert that the Northwestern retirement plan fiduciaries violated ERISA’s duty of prudence based on the following: the number of investment options included on the plan menu; the decision to contract with multiple recordkeepers who put
Latest Post
More Posts
The DOL’s About-face on ESG for ERISA Plan Fiduciary Investment Decision-making
Podcast: Pooled Employer Plans (“PEPs”)—An Outsourcing Opportunity for Small and Larger Employers as well as Private Equity Sponsors to Reduce their ERISA Fiduciary Responsibilities
Ropes & Gray Hosts Webinar on Retirement Plan Litigation for Employers and Plan Sponsors
Podcast: The DOL’s Cybersecurity Guidance for Retirement Plan Sponsors, Service Providers and Participants
Podcast: The DOL’s Cybersecurity Guidance for Retirement Plan Sponsors, Service Providers and Participants
Podcast: The Evolving Regulatory Landscape for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries—Cybersecurity Concerns for Plan Sponsors
3 Takeaways From Intel Retirement Plan Leaders’ ERISA Win
Podcast: The Evolving Regulatory Landscape for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries—The Biden Administration & ESG and Proxy Voting Rules
Supreme Court Significantly Raises the Bar for Defined Benefit Plan Participants to File ERISA Fiduciary Breach Lawsuits, but the Risk of Lawsuit Remains
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org