On February 28, 2022, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued a decision on priority in an interference proceeding between the Broad Institute, Inc., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and President and Fellows of Harvard College (collectively, “Broad”) and the Regents of the University of California, University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, “CVC”), and held that Broad’s inventors were the first to invent the subject matter of Count 1 of the interference,[1] a CRISPR-Cas9 system with a single guide RNA able to cleave or edit DNA to affect gene expression in a eukaryotic cell. The Regents of the University of California v. The Broad Institute, Inc., Interference No. 106,115, Decision on Priority at 2, 4 (PTAB Feb. 28, 2022).
Latest Post
More Posts
New PTAB Informative Decisions: Applying the Fintiv Factors in View of Parallel District Court Litigation
Recent Precedential and Informative Decisions Clarify Standard for Discretionary Denials of Institution
PTAB 1600 Tech Center Round-Up: Week of February 25-March 1
Arguments in Reply that Expand on Previously Argued Rationale Should Be Considered by the PTAB
Federal Circuit Rejects Importing Claim Limitation in Blackbird Tech LLC v. ELB Electronics, Inc.
USPTO’s Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance Evolves After Vanda Pharms. Inc. v. West-Ward Pharms.
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org