It is very common to defend against a claim of patent infringement by litigating in the district court and the PTAB in parallel. The most straightforward-way for the defendant to win is to persuade the PTAB that the asserted patent is invalid. But, that is becoming more difficult as Director Iancu pushes the PTAB to apply greater scrutiny to petitions in order to address patent owner criticism that the PTAB proceedings are unfair. However, a recent decision disposing of a non-practicing entity’s long-running litigation against Ubisoft highlights how a defendant that ultimately lost on an issue before the PTAB can use the loss to their advantage in district court.
More Posts
Converting an IPR Loss into a District Court Win
PTAB Continues to Preclude PTAB Challenges That It Views As Untimely
Caution to Game Companies: PTAB Continues to Preclude PTAB Challenges That It Views As Untimely
Caution to Game Companies: PTAB Continues to Preclude PTAB Challenges That It Views As Untimely
Failure to Launch: Not Identifying the Proper Parties Can Prematurely End an Video Game IPR Challenge
Failure to Launch: Not Identifying the Proper Parties Can Prematurely End an Video Game IPR Challenge
Challenges in Filing Successful IPR Petitions for Video Game Patents
Challenges in Filing Successful IPR Petitions for Video Game Patents
Challenges in Filing Successful IPR Petitions for Video Game Patents
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS