A U.S. District Court recently denied a government application for an administrative inspection warrant to enter a private business for the purpose of searching for and seizing undocumented immigrants and investigating a pattern or practice of employing unauthorized aliens (sometimes referred to as a “Blackie’s” warrant after a seminal case, discussed below). Unlike a criminal search warrant, administrative inspection warrants may allow a government agency to search a premises for a civil administrative purpose (as opposed to a criminal investigation) and may generally be issued pursuant to a less rigorous standard as compared to criminal search warrants. In In re Sealed Search Warrant Application, the court rejected the government’s efforts to obtain an administrative inspection warrant rather than a criminal search warrant, reasoning that it could not issue an administrative inspection warrant in the context of a workplace immigration raid based on a lesser showing than that required for criminal search warrants under the Fourth Amendment. No. CV 3:25-MC-05067, 2025 WL 1499054 (S.D. Tex. May 27, 2025).
Latest Post
More Posts
Tulsi Gabbard’s Confirmation Hearing for Director of National Intelligence: A Preview of a FISA Section 702 Reauthorization Fight?
President Biden Signs Executive Order to Implement EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework
Supreme Court Holds FISA Does Not Displace the State Secrets Privilege
Federal Court Expresses Skepticism About Validity of Geofence Warrants But Declines Suppression Remedy
U.S. and Australia Sign CLOUD Act Agreement
The Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in American Civil Liberties Union v. United States
The Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in American Civil Liberties Union v. United States
Illinois Enacts Protecting Household Privacy Act
Ninth Circuit’s Interpretation of Private Search Exception to the Fourth Amendment Contributes to “Growing Tension” Among Circuit Courts
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS