In the much-anticipated decision of Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 2 (Badenoch (HCA)), the High Court of Australia (the HCA) has now confirmed that the peak indebtedness rule may not be used when assessing the quantum of an unfair preference claim arising from a continuing business relationship. While the decision is
Latest Post
More Posts
First decision on Australia’s ipso facto stay in voluntary administration
TMA submissions on corporate insolvency in Australia
Atlas shrugged: the limits of an administrator’s lien over secured property
Parliamentary inquiry into corporate insolvency in Australia
BTI v Sequana – Key UK Supreme Court insolvency ruling clarifies stance on creditor duties
Sending disclaimer to the sawmill: A liquidator’s power to disclaim land subject to environmental liabilities following the Australian Sawmilling case
COMI as first port of call? Harris J lays out a modified common law framework for recognising foreign insolvency proceedings in Hong Kong
Crypto winter is here – what does it mean for insolvency practitioners?
Can a Chapter 15 order discharge US law governed debt for the purposes of the rule in Gibbs? The Rare Earth and Modern Land decisions
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS