On December 1 2025, I had finished an article about how the defendant might avoid the application of the per se rule in his upcoming trial for allegedly rigging a bid for a multi-million dollar entertainment facility for a public university in Texas. On December 2, 2025, the President pardoned the defendant. My article did
Latest Post
More Posts
Testimony of Roger P. Alford on Politicalization of Antitrust Enforcement before the House Subcommittee on the Administrative States, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust
New Article: Per Se Rule Related Defenses In Criminal Antitrust Prosecutions
Some Thoughts on the Antitrust Division’s New Whistleblower Reward Program
Whistling in the Wind…For a Whistleblower Statute To Help Hypothetical Bill
DOJ Fugitive Page (And the Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine)
What If There Was No Per Se Rule in Criminal Cases?
Compliments to the Procurement Collusion Strike Force (and a trip down memory lane)
Supreme Court Set To Make Cert Decision On Per Se Battle
Brewbaker Strikes Back: The DOJ’s Per Se “Death Star” Attacked
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org