Republic Technologies (NA) LLC (“Republic”) filed an application to register the proposed mark 4:20 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). Republic amended its goods twice during prosecution of the application and ultimately sought to register “tobacco; cigarette papers; cigarette filters; cigarette tubes; cigarette rolling machines; handheld machines for injecting tobacco into cigarette tubes; machines allowing smokers to make cigarettes by themselves; none of the foregoing containing or for use with cannabis” (emphasis added). The USPTO alleged that consumers would understand 4:20 to mean cannabis, the mark misdescribes non-cannabis related goods, and consumers would believe the misrepresentation. Therefore, the USPTO refused registration alleging that the mark was deceptively misdescriptive of the goods in the application. Republic appealed the decision to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”). But the Board saw through the smoke of Republic’s arguments and affirmed the refusal.
More Posts
What’s the Delta? How Delta-8 Can Provide Trademark Rights for Hemp and Marijuana
What’s the Delta? How Delta-8 Can Provide Trademark Rights for Hemp and Marijuana
Blunders That Made ‘Bakked’ Cannabis TM Go Up In Smoke
Blunders That Made ‘Bakked’ Cannabis TM Go Up In Smoke
The Supremacy Clause and Trademarks: Why State Cannabis Legalization Isn’t Enough for a Federal Trademark
Indica and IP – A Series on the Intersection of Cannabis and Intellectual Property
California Ruling May Sow Seeds of Cannabis Patent Precedent
Brian Michaelis, Matthew Brekus, and JC Zwisler Write on California Ruling Possibly Setting a Cannabis Patent Precedent in Law360
Flowers, Gummies & An IP Lawyer’s Impressions of MJBizCon
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS