The US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana ordered the $750 million Bayou Bridge pipeline to halt construction within the Atchafalaya Basin when it concluded that the US Army Corps of Engineers’ environmental analysis likely violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the Clean Water Act due to the following deficiencies: the Corps did not provide sufficient explanation for how the proposed off-site mitigation would compensate for the loss of wetlands impacted by construction; and the Corps failed to sufficiently consider and address historical impacts to wetlands from past pipeline projects in the cumulative effects analysis. On appeal, however, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit overturned the lower court.
Latest Post
More Posts
2015 “Waters of the US” Rule Enjoined in an Additional 11 States
Second Circuit Affirms Waiver Period for State Water Quality Certification Begins Upon Receipt of Request for Certification
Second Circuit Affirms Waiver Period for State Water Quality Certification Begins Upon Receipt of Request for Certification
Federal District Court Halts Construction of Louisiana Pipeline Due to Corps’ Failure to Explain Off-Site Mitigation
Federal District Court Halts Construction of Louisiana Pipeline Due to Corps’ Failure to Explain Off-Site Mitigation
Ambitious White House Infrastructure Legislation Proposal Would Make Major Changes to Environmental Permitting and Reviews
D.C. Circuit Raises the Stakes: NEPA Defect Sufficient to Halt Pipeline Operations
Agencies Move Quickly to Delay Applicability of 2015 WOTUS Rule Following Unanimous Supreme Court Decision
Should Mitigation Meet a “Net Gain” Standard? USFWS is Reconsidering its Stance
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org