Recently, the PTAB excluded Patent Owner expert witness testimony because during the expert’s deposition, on redirect, Patent Owner’s counsel asked leading questions. IPR2014-01146, Paper 36, pg. 6. The PTAB relied on Federal Rule of Evidence 611(c), and cited to McCormick on Evidence, § 6 (7th ed. 2013), which states “[a] leading question is one that suggests to the witness the answer desired by the examiner.” Is the PTAB, in reading a cold record and applying an unforgiving reading of the rule, setting a dangerous precedent on admissible testimony?
Latest Post
More Posts
PTAB Drops the Hammer on Petitioners: Five IPR Petitions Denied on the Same Day
PTAB Denies CBM Petition for Lack of Standing, Interpreting “Privies” as Customers and Not Suppliers
Footnote on Claim Amendment More Interesting than Federal Circuit Holding?
PTAB Relaxing its Application of Law Governing IPR Claim Amendments
Prior Art Must be Analogous to the Entire Scope of Problem
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org