A March 30, 2026, decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, in Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Department of the Interior, vacated key provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) regulations, including several regulations from 2019 that were revised and/or reissued in 2024. This ruling arrives amid a swirl of potential changes to implementation of the ESA, and signals that courts will be closely scrutinizing forthcoming regulations for consistency with a statute that has long been labeled the “pit bull” of environmental statutes.
Latest Post
More Posts
Five For Five: How the APA Protected Offshore Wind (For Now)
Spin Doctor: Court Strikes Down Wind Permitting Freeze As Illegal
Navigating a New WOTUS Definition: Agencies Redefine the Line
Groundhog Day: Proposed Revisions to ESA Regulations (Mostly) Reinstate the 2019 Rules
Illegal Eagles: DOI Sinks Its Talons Even Deeper Into Wind Energy
Renewables in the Crosshairs: DOI and DOT Announce Numerous New Anti-Wind and Solar Orders and Policies
Texas Legislature Tilts Against Windmills: Is This the End of Wind Energy on the Texas Coast?
Déjà vu? FWS Solicits Feedback to Update Section 10(a) of the ESA
One-Track Mind: Unanimous SCOTUS Decision on Rail Line Approval Further Narrows Scope of NEPA
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org