The Ninth Circuit recently reaffirmed that the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act requires a plaintiff to describe its alleged trade secret with sufficient particularity. But the Ninth Circuit opened the door to allowing a plaintiff to modify its trade secret identification after discovery. It held that a district court abused its discretion in granting summary
Latest Post
More Posts
Epic v. Tata: Trade Secret Damages Reduced to $280M
Zomm, LLC v. Apple Inc.
Heraeus Medical GMBH v. Esschem Inc.
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org