Background
A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court recently held that the requirement of a certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (“Evidence Act”), is a condition precedent to the admissibility of electronic record in evidence.[1] This judgment arose from a reference by a Division Bench of the Supreme Court, which found that the Division Bench judgment in Shafhi Mohammad v. State of Himachal Pradesh[2] required reconsideration in view of the three-judge bench judgment in Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer.[3]
Latest Post
More Posts
Competition or Unlawful Contractual Interference: The Line Continues to Remain Blurred
Do parties have an unfettered right to exclude or limit their liability for breach of contract? – Part II
Do parties have an unfettered right to exclude or limit their liability for breach of contract? – Part I
To Pay Rent or Not To Pay Rent? The Delhi High Court rejects plea for suspension of rent during lockdown
Determinable Contracts Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Part II
Determinable contracts under the Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Part I
Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – A Fly in the Ointment? (Part II)
Section 34(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – A Fly in the Ointment? (Part I)
Contract of service or contract for service: The Supreme Court Test
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org