On May 28 2015, The California Court of Appeals issued a decision in Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board, 187 Cal.Rptr.3d 672; and it was ultimately about much more than the validity of an election within California’s combined-reporting regime. It also tackled issues and, perhaps most importantly, blurred lines surrounding the Commerce Clause’s substantial nexus
More Posts
Inside the New York Budget Bill: Department Issues Guidance Regarding Investment Capital Identification Procedures
Reporting Audit Changes – New York City Amends Provision on Apportionment
Inside the New York Budget Bill: New York City Tax Reform
Inside the New York Budget Bill: Sales Tax Provisions
Inside the New York Budget Bill: Net Operating Losses and Investment Tax Credit
Inside the New York Budget Bill: Combined Reporting
Inside the New York Budget Bill: Apportionment
Inside the New York Budget Bill: Tax Rates and Qualified New York Manufacturers
Inside the New York Budget Bill: Tax Base and Income Classifications
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org