The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court order excluding expert validity testimony based on collateral estoppel stemming from an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding of a related patent, finding that an unpatentability decision in an IPR does not collaterally estop a patentee from making validity arguments about related claims
Latest Post
More Posts
Later-Filed, Earlier-Expiring Patent Not an ODP Reference
Section 337 Doesn’t Require Article III Standing for Claimant but Claimant Must Be “Patentee”
Stud-y Harder: Domestic Industry Must Be Established for Each Asserted Patent
ITC Shines Light on DI: Complainant Can’t Aggregate Investments Across Patents, Prongs
R&D Expenditures Need Only Relate to Subset of Domestic Industry Product
Mootness Requires Covenant Not to Sue to Be Unconditional and Irrevocable
No Smoking Gun Here: Soliciting Input Sufficient to Satisfy Commission’s Statutory Obligation
Present-Tense Claim Terms Not Sufficient to Require Actual Operation
Threat of ITC Exclusion Order Is Too Speculative to Constitute Irreparable Harm
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org