Most states impose sales or use tax on tangible personal property sold or consumed in the state. However, five states – Alaska, Delaware Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon – do not impose such a tax. In its landmark South Dakota v. Wayfair decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that out-of-state sellers can be required to collect and remit tax on sales into another state in which the seller had no physical presence. The response from New Hampshire was swift and to the point. Governor Chris Sununu immediately tweeted that the Court’s ruling was “outrageous” and that “if they think we are just going to take this without a fight, well then they have another thing coming.”
More Posts
DOL Issues Guidance on Payroll Rounding, Overtime Calculations, and Certain Paralegals
Smoke Clears For Employers Under New Illinois Marijuana Law
PEOs, Staffing Companies: Watch Proposed New Joint Employer Rule
Removing Transaction Thresholds – Where does Wayfair go from here?
Job Descriptions Can Be A Shield or Sword
Age Discrimination Claims Limited for Job Applicants
Illinois Expands Employee Rights and Imposes New Obligations on Employers
Arbitration Agreements: Tips for Enforceability
A Tip from the Department of Labor: The 80/20 Rule Has Been Rescinded
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org