In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (decided June 23, 2021) the Supreme Court decided that a regulation that required agricultural employers to allow union representatives to access their property for up to 3 hours per day for 120 days per year, was a per se taking, reversing a 9th Circuit decision that held this regulation
Latest Post
More Posts
Standing to Sue: Can Environmental Organizations Create Standing to Sue – PETA v State Zoological Park
Two Recent Appellate Division Decisions Reject Segmentation Arguments: It Cannot be Segmentation Unless There is a Plan
New Caselaw Highlights the Boundary Between Environmental Law and Corporate Law
Chesapeake Action Network v EPA: Court Tells EPA to Reconsider Rule Because Petitioners Did Not Have a Fair Opportunity to Comment
Environmental Impact Statements: Which Effects of an Action are Impacts that must be Considered?
Environmental Impact Statements: Which Effects of an Action are Impacts that must be Considered?
Dispelling 5 Misconceptions About Environmental Issues, Continued
Dispelling 5 Misconceptions About Environmental Issues, Continued
Dispelling 5 Misconceptions About Environmental Issues, Continued
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org