Introduction:
A division bench of the Supreme Court in M/s Inox Renewables Ltd. v. Jayesh Electricals Ltd.[1] has recently reiterated the decision in BSG SGS SOMA JV vs. NHPC Limited[2], equating the juridical concepts of seat and venue. In this regard, the Court has clarified that a shift in venue by mutual agreement between the parties would be tantamount to a shifting of the place/ seat of arbitration.
More Posts
The 1986 Act or The 2019 Act? The Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability
Limitation period for filing a Section 34 Petition begins from the Date of Receipt of the Signed Copy of the Arbitral Award
One-Sided Contractual Terms Constitute Unfair Trade Practice under Consumer Law in India
Supreme Court Clarifies that Acceptance of a Conditional Offer with a Further Condition does not Result in a Concluded Contract
Writs Against Orders Passed by Arbitral Tribunals – The Supreme Court Reiterates the Law
Time is of the essence for registration of a lease
Decoding the Law on Anticipatory Bail
The Supreme Court Revisits the Consequences of Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on the Arbitration Agreement – Part II
The Supreme Court Revisits the Consequences of Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on the Arbitration Agreement – Part I
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS