Summary: The Bombay High Court has recently, in Norvic Shipping Asia PTE Limited v. Zigma International and Malaney Trading & Services LLP v. Uzer Makina VE Kalip Sanayi A.S. granted interim relief in foreign seated arbitrations. Providing guidance on the requirements for obtaining such interim protection, the Court has reiterated that parties to foreign seated arbitrations have the option of approaching Indian Courts to preserve the underlying subject matter of their dispute. This approach upholds party autonomy, which is the very basis of arbitration, and is in line with the UNCITRAL Model Law. This post draws upon past experiences to highlight key takeaways for parties seeking such relief.
Latest Post
More Posts
From the Arabian Sea to the Strait of Malacca: Forging the India-Singapore Axis
Delhi High Court Clarifies Scope of Anti-Arbitration Injunctions in Foreign-Seated Proceedings
Supreme Court affirms arbitrators’ power to implead non-signatories: Another pro-arbitration ruling or a step too far?
Recognition of Indian CIRP in Singapore: A Step Forward for Cross-Border Insolvency
Some Key Features of the SIAC rules 2025 and their implications for India-related Arbitrations
Putting the Brakes on Highway Tolls: Extending the Model Code of Conduct to Existing Contracts?
Technicality or Trivialisation? SAT’s Attempt to Balance Interests of Justice
Invoking Material Adverse Change based on Covid-19: Easier said than done
COVID-19: Absence of Legislative Intervention may impact Commercial Insurance Claims
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS