Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

FTC Settles Supplement Maker Over Unsubstantiated Claims and Expert Endorsement

By Matthew Y. Kane & Njeri Chasseau on October 11, 2016

On October 5, 2016, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) settled its case with Supple, LLC over certain advertising claims regarding its Supple joint supplement. Between 2011 and 2015, the company advertised (via social media, radio, and in-person pitches) that the supplement was scientifically proven to provide complete relief from chronic and severe joint pain stemming from arthritis and fibromyalgia. Additionally, the FTC charged one of the company’s principals for making unsubstantiated “expert endorsement” claims and for misrepresenting herself as an independent, impartial medical expert when in fact she was an employee of the company.  As part of the settlement, Supple and its principals may be required to pay $150 million to the FTC if they fail to comply with the terms of the stipulated order.    

Takeaway: Advertisers and marketers should ensure that any claims they make about pain relief, disease treatment, or other health benefits are supported by valid scientific evidence. Additionally, endorsements should adequately disclose any material connection between the advertiser and the endorser. 

 

 

  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    AdLaw By Request®
  • Organization:
    Reed Smith LLP

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo