Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

10th Circuit Hears Oral Arguments On Passport Gender Markers

By Howard Friedman on January 23, 2020

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit yesterday heard oral arguments (audio of full arguments) in Zzyym v. Pompeo. In the case, a Colorado federal district court held that the State Department’s policy on passport gender designations is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. (Full text of district court’s 2018 opinion). The Department requires selection of “M” or “F” as gender on passport applications, and refused to allow plaintiff who is an intersex individual to select “X” as a gender marker. Lambda Legal’s case page has extensive additional information and links to pleadings, briefs and decisions in the case.

  • Posted in:
    Government, Supreme Court
  • Blog:
    Religion Clause
  • Organization:
    Howard M. Friedman
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo