Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Abuse: Set aside application with debate as to date of agreement.

By Bill Madden on June 26, 2026

RNT v The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [2026] WADC 53 (Link to JADE).

Although dealt with by a Western Australian court, this application required consideration of Queensland law.

As noted at [10], s 48(5A) of the Limitation of Actions (Child Sexual Abuse) and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2016 (Qld) (the Act) allows a court to set aside an agreement in some circumstances.  If the agreement was made after 1 March 2017, a court does not have power to set an agreement aside. (1 March 2017 was the date on which the limitation period for abuse claims was altered by s 11A of the Act.)

RNT argued that a binding agreement had been reached by 3 February 2017 for payment of $80,000 plus costs, however it was agreed between the parties that a Deed had later been executed on 2 March 2017.

The court held that there was an intention to effect legal relations and that the parties intended to be bound immediately (3 February 2017). ([106]). Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 was discussed.

The court further held that it was just and reasonable to set aside the Deed under s 48(5A) of the Act. While the limitation period was of no influence to either party ([169]), there was a basis, yet to be tested, for a substantial claim to be made (in excess of the earlier settlement) ([203]).

[BillMaddensWordpress #2544]

  • Posted in:
    Health Care
  • Blog:
    Bill Madden's Blog
  • Organization:
    Bill Madden
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo