Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Abuse: Therapeutic massage & damages assessment.

By Bill Madden on December 4, 2023

EF v GH [2023] NSWDC 538 (on Caselaw).

With thanks to Patrick Thompson for drawing attention to this decision.

EF sought damages from the defendant GH for the tort of battery and consequential psychiatric injuries arising from the historic sexual abuse by the defendant of the plaintiff when she was a child aged 12.

At the relevant time, the plaintiff was an elite athlete who trained and performed under the auspices of a government institution in the Australian Capital Territory. The plaintiff was referred to the defendant for therapeutic massage purposes and the defendant was retained by the plaintiff’s parents to provide such services to her. An unusual feature of the case is that the alleged sexual misconduct by the defendant occurred whilst the plaintiff was receiving therapeutic massage services in the presence of the plaintiff’s mother. There is no suggestion that the plaintiff’s mother was aware of the improper nature of what was occurring to the plaintiff at the relevant time. It appears from all the evidence that what was occurring to the plaintiff happened covertly.

In light of the nature of the conduct pleaded and the age of the plaintiff at the relevant time, issues of consent to the battery did not arise.

The plaintiff commenced proceedings by filing a Statement of Claim on 30 September 2022 against both the current (first) defendant and the Government institution referred to above as the second defendant. The plaintiff discontinued her claim against the Government institution in May 2023.

The claim against the first defendant proceeded as an assessment, in his absence. Damages were awarded as follows:

Head of Damage

Amount Claimed Detail
General damages for non-economic loss $150,000 Half of the amount which should be allowed for the plaintiff’s combined abuse by the defendant and the government institution
Interest on $100,000 at 2% $48,000 The amount of $100,000 amounts to two-thirds of the amount for non-economic loss for the past and one-third for the future.
Aggravated damages $50,000 Due to the nature of the conduct and the circumstances in which it was committed
Past out-of-pocket expenses $2,000  
Future out-of-pocket expenses $50,000 This is for future medical expenses relying on the estimates in Dr Gaunson’s report
Past economic loss Buffer of $150,000  
Future loss of earning capacity Buffer of $250,000  
Amount for superannuation $50,000  
Total $750,000  

[BillMaddensWordpress #2206]

  • Posted in:
    Health Care
  • Blog:
    Bill Madden's Blog
  • Organization:
    Bill Madden
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo