Maybe moreso than even political candidates, attorneys are known for always wanting to get the last word. Therefore, courts set up rules to prevent endless “yeah, buts”.
![]() |
| “No, I get the last word!” |
But, Kari Lake’s attorneys are not just playing to the Justices in their already-decided Election Contest appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court. Which might explain why today they filed another “yeah, but” which is not permitted by court rules, to support their Motion for Reconsideration that is expressly prohibited by the Supreme Court’s rules.
None of which can help their case as the Justices decide whether to sanction them for their earlier unsupported accusations about more than 35,000 ballots being illegally injected into Maricopa County’s election last year.
Besides trying to take a fourth bite of the apple regarding their injected ballot theory, Lake claims today (below) that she did not violate Rule 22(f) that prohibits filing “a motion for reconsideration of… an order denying a petition for review” because she “did not request reconsideration of ‘the *entire* election contest’”. (I cannot throw Lake or her attorneys very far, but I could throw them farther than that Lake defense would fly.)
***
Recent relevant articles:
