Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Abuse: Admissibility of tendency evidence.

By Bill Madden on August 5, 2021

DP v Bishop Paul Bernard Bird [2021] VSC 453 (on AUSTLII) is a ruling in the course of a claim by DP in which he alleged that in 1971, when he was five or six years of age, he was assaulted by a Catholic priest Father Bryan Coffey (now deceased) at his parents’ home .

The ruling concerned the admissibility of tendency evidence from nine witnesses who also make allegations about Father Coffey’s conduct in the 1960s and 70s.

Although opposed by the defendant, the Court held that the terms of section 97 of the Evidence Act 2008 were satisfied and therefore the plaintiff was entitled to rely upon the evidence of the witnesses. At [9]:

Their evidence is patently relevant to a fact in issue: it has sufficiently specific and clear common threads relevant to Father Coffey’s state of mind and sexual conduct as demonstrated by the allegations of the nine witnesses. It is of significant probative value to DP’s case.

  • Posted in:
    Health Care
  • Blog:
    Bill Madden's Blog
  • Organization:
    Bill Madden
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo